AZ judge dismisses marijuana social equity lawsuit, but plaintiffs vow to fight

A lawsuit that attempted to keep coveted social equity marijuana business licenses in Arizona out of the hands of big businesses has been dismissed, with the presiding judge ruling that state regulators have acted in keeping with the law.

“The voters left to (the Arizona Department of Health Services) how the social equity ownership program should work, and the rules (the agency) developed comply with the law and are reasonably designed to meet its objectives,” Judge Randall Warner of the Maricopa County Superior Court wrote in his ruling, which granted the state’s motion to dismiss the case.

The suit was filed in November by the Greater Phoenix Urban League and social equity company Acre 41.

A spokesperson for the plaintiffs said in a news release that they’re not giving up the fight and that a second suit might be filed in the coming months.

Whether a suit is filed depends on how an upcoming lottery for the 26 social equity licenses plays out, the release noted.

2022 MJBiz Factbook – Now Available

The essential resource for cannabis business leaders across all sectors provides the latest data and in-depth analysis you need to develop informed business strategies and avoid costly missteps.

Featured Inside:
  • Segmented research reports for the marijuana + hemp industries 
  • Accurate financial forecasts + investment trends  
  • State-by-state guide to regulations, taxes & opportunities  
  • 40+ charts and graphs with key data points


Get the facts and stay ahead of the curve.

“Since the court will not accept the challenge to the program as a whole, the focus will now shift to specific applicants who are adversely impacted if the lottery is permitted to be held with the current application pool,” Acre 41 Principal Celeste Rodriguez said in a statement, adding that roughly half of the 1,500 applications are “MSO-sponsored.”

Rodriguez pledged that unless the applicant pool is culled to include only “true social equity applicants” – and not those backed by multistate operators – that her group would file a second suit and identify MSO-connected applicants by name.