Canadian Senate committee asks for marijuana legalization delay

(This story has been updated from an earlier version.)

Two Senate committees reviewing Canada’s proposed marijuana legislation are asking for significant changes to the bill before it becomes law – changes that could delay implementation and have a major impact on businesses prepping for the recreational market.

The point person on cannabis legalization in Canada’s Senate, Tony Dean, told Marijuana Business Daily that he has “no doubt” that the Senate will work through the summer, if necessary, to work on the bill.

The Committee on Aboriginal Peoples wants the bill amended to address a “lack of meaningful consultation” with First Nations communities and asked for a delay of up to one year.

The committee has asked for changes in a number of areas, including excise tax sharing, educational materials and programs and health-related issues.

“It is imperative that Bill C-45 be delayed until First Nations are consulted and an amendment to the bill is co-developed to ensure that they receive a share of the excise tax revenues,” the committee wrote in its report.

It also requested a “preferential licensing system” for indigenous-owned or -controlled entities “to ensure that interested indigenous communities have the appropriate tools to seize economic opportunities as they arise.”

Isadore Day, regional chief for the Ontario Assembly of First Nations, has been pushing for a delay to the law.

“The federal government, provinces and territories have not done anywhere near an effective job in engaging and considering us within the process,” he said in an interview with Marijuana Business Daily.

Current indigenous businesses

Phil Fontaine, CEO of Indigenous Roots and former National Chief of the Assembly of First Nations, said he’s supportive of further consultation but noted that any delay to legalization would adversely impact his and other indigenous-owned companies.

“You wouldn’t want to delay opportunities to First Nations that are already prepared to be part of the industry,” he told MJBizDaily. “That would be the outcome.”

Indigenous Roots, a joint venture with licensed producer Cronos Group, works with First Nations to build and operate licensed facilities and provide medical cannabis to indigenous communities.

It’s one of a small number of indigenous-owned medical marijuana producers in Canada.

Pressure builds on home grow

Meanwhile, seven of the 12 members on the Committee on Legal and Constitutional Affairs want to strip home cultivation from the law over concerns that cannabis could be diverted to the illicit market.

The federal government proposed allowing Canadians to grow up for four plants per household, but Manitoba and Quebec are looking to ban home cultivation.

Removing the homegrown-cannabis provision would be a blow to companies gearing up to capitalize on the niche market – from sales of equipment, genetics and other supplies – come legalization later this year.

Six committee members want to limit the THC content of cannabis and cannabis-related products to 16% for consumers over 21 years old and 8% for those aged between 18 and 21. They also want to increase the minimum age for purchasing cannabis from 18 to 21 .

The same six senators want the law to come into force one year after Royal Assent is given.

Next steps

The committee reports have been sent to the Committee on Social Affairs, which will decide whether to adopt the recommended amendments.

The Senate is scheduled to hold a final vote on the bill June 7.

If senators approve any amendments, the cannabis bill goes back to the House of Commons, where elected politicians would have to choose between accepting the changes in the interest of passing the law or further debate, which could require the Senate to take another look.

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau declined to comment directly on a potential delay, according to CTV News, but said the Liberals will “forge ahead with their plan to legalize marijuana for recreational use.”

Matt Lamers can be reached at [email protected]

To sign up for our weekly Canada marijuana business newsletter, click here.

7 comments on “Canadian Senate committee asks for marijuana legalization delay
  1. Rob on

    16% THC is a joke, as a medical user I need a stronger dose. Why limit it when it should just come in different strengths like pharmaceuticals from regular to extra strength. With it being stronger you need to consume less of it. I think thy should put it all on pause until they are ready to legalize without a whole bunch of new laws. They claimed that it was about keeping away from teens, yet no mention of a way to get it out of high schools. They can’t even keep tobacco out of schools. All schools should be smoke free. Trying to take over a market with an inferior product at two or three times the price, has never worked in history. They are trying to sell poisoned hemp at marijuana prices. Some provinces are stupid enough to want to sell it out of liquor stores. No recovering alcoholic should have to risk their sobriety and be forced into a liquor store to purchase marijuana.

    Reply
  2. Paul Sorensen on

    OMG just open for business as scheduled already! All of this micro management has nothing to do with the realities of the marketplace. Just set a process in place to deal with the ‘actual’ challenges as they appear. This is a whole new world. Just plan to be reactive.
    Good grief!

    Reply
  3. lovingc on

    You have had more time than is needed already and you want more? Enact the law as is and go back and amend it as needed. Get real you are only delaying the inevitable.

    Reply
    • Robert Eckart on

      Finally, a response that makes sense. There are too many small interest groups that have their own agenda and are not thinking of the whole picture. This is a process. As it unfolds, there will be the need to adjust and amend to make it better. Just get on with it so the process can begin.

      Reply
  4. Clayton McCann on

    C-45 is deeply flawed, but not in terms of 4 plants for home cultivation. Rather, the bill mandates civil forfeiture provisions which are dangerous threats to Charter rights of Canadians: seizure of property if law enforcement “suspects” a person is producing MJ (not even convicted murderers or rapists face such repercussions!). And C-46 has problems, too: mandating stop/search/seize provisions which threaten Canadians’ freedom of movement, as well as a “reasonable expectation of privacy” outlined by the Supreme Court of Canada.

    I have written to Conservative Senators and Independent Senators on committees concerning these matters, but to little avail. These folks seem more interested in pushing for arcane restrictions, and based on absurd assumptions, such as second-hand MJ smoke harming children, when ample, peer-reviewed evidence suggests this is not a risk.

    Reply
  5. Joe Legobie on

    The Senate has studied this since the 1972. I know that senators are old and need extra time but this is just stupid !
    Delays to justify your existence do not cut it!

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *