California gov suggests big changes to new marijuana system

California Gov. Jerry Brown has issued a series of proposed changes to his state’s upcoming marijuana regulatory system in an effort to reconcile differences between a 2015 medical marijuana oversight law and the new recreational cannabis ballot initiative voters approved last year.

Among the numerous changes Brown put forth were several significant ones that were immediately hailed by the industry as a step in the right direction:

  • Repealing a mandate that would require a local permit for MJ companies – on top of a state license – unless the city or county in which a business is located has its own licensing system
  • Allowing for total vertical integration, meaning that a single company could have as many business license types as it wants, with the exception of testing labs
  • Repealing a requirement that MJ companies use third-party distributors to shuttle products around the state, between growers, manufacturers, and retailers

There were several other smaller changes as well, including tweaks to the definition of “owner” for cannabis companies, the elimination of state-issued medical marijuana cards in favor of county-issued MMJ cards, and the creation of a Marijuana Control Appeals Panel to oversee matters such as license disputes or enforcement actions.

There was also one big change Brown proposed that a number of California companies are already vowing to fight: A ban on adult-use licenses and medical licenses being allowed to operate in the same location.

If the ban is allowed to stand, it would effectively mean that retailers and other business types would be forced to choose which market they want to serve. Alternatively, they would have to spend money to obtain separate licenses and build different locations so they could serve both the medical and adult-use markets.

Check back with Marijuana Business Daily on Thursday for more on this story.

Latest Headlines

One comment on “California gov suggests big changes to new marijuana system
  1. Pam on

    The provision for switching the issuance of Ca. MMJ cards is a a very bad idea. Why? One reason: It took several if not more than several years to get all of the 58 counties of Ca. to implement the state mandate to issue MMJ cards to eligible candidates based upon a uniform regulatory framework. In fact, some counties flat out refused to to implement state mandated law. So, those counties got sued by the state of ca. Eventually, those counties came around to following state law around this mandate. But, it took time and tax payer resources to force those resistant counties to comply. What do you think is going to happen if individual counties are allowed to decide who gets an MMJ card? Many legitimate patient applicants won’t get them. For starters, some of those patients will be forced to leave the county they live in to get one in a reasonable county. It’s just going to cause a lot more problems than it’s going to solve. Not in the public’s best interest. Probably in a special interests best interest’s. That provision really needs to be stricken prior to the vote in June 2017.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *