Week in Review: MassRoots battles cannaphobia again, Hawaii heats up & Arizona MMJ threat

Help shape our annual “Diversity in Cannabis” special report by filling out our business survey here!


By Omar Sacirbey

A marijuana executive addresses the tech sector’s cannaphobia, Hawaii opens its MMJ application process, and Arizona’s medical marijuana program comes under attack once again. Here’s a closer look at several notable developments in the marijuana industry over the past week.

Cannabias rears its head

Among his efforts for 2016, Isaac Dietrich, the founder of marijuana social media platform MassRoots, had already planned to push back against what he sees as a prejudice against marijuana by some of his tech sector peers.

“People in the Silicon Valley tech sector talk like they have these very progressive views, but when it comes to cannabis, they are really very regressive,” said Dietrich.

Those plans now have more impetus, Dietrich said, following a controversy where Dell, the Texas-based computer giant, declined an invitation to judge a high-profile contest among start-up companies that was sponsored by the Consumer Electronics Show, a major tradeshow organized by the Consumer Electronics Association.

The reason? MassRoots – a cannabis-related company – was competing.

“I wish they had more progressive views on marijuana, and hope they come around to seeing that legalization would be positive,” Dietrich said.

Dietrich said many tech companies, including household names like Facebook and Google, discriminate against marijuana companies by not allowing them to advertise on their sites.

“There’s a disconnect between tech leaders and the tech public on this issue,” Dietrich said. “There needs to be public pressure put on these people to get things to change.”

And where is Dietrich going to get that kind of muscle? MassRoots users, he said, who now number about 725,000 and are projected to hit one million in the first half of the year. He hopes to get users to email and put other forms of pressure on tech companies that have discriminatory views towards marijuana companies.

“When you have that many email addresses, you can get some pressure going,” Dietrich said.

As for the contest, Dietrich didn’t win but still gets to have dinner with Sir Richard Branson, Chairman of the Virgin Group and noted marijuana advocate. What will Dietrich ask him about? “Certainly about marijuana,” he said.

Hawaii heats up

The race for marijuana licenses is on in Hawaii, which opened its application process on Jan. 12.

The Aloha State will award eight licenses for medical marijuana businesses on the islands of Oahu, Maui, Kauai and the Big Island. Each licensee will be allowed two production centers and two retail stores. Out-of-state residents can own up to 49% of a license.

Three of the licenses will go to applicants in Oahu, where Honolulu is. License winners will be announced in mid-April, and dispensaries could be open by July 2016.

Industry observers pointed to Maryland, which received an overwhelming 1,046 applications, including 811 for dispensaries, as an indicator that many people will try to break into Hawaii. The marijuana market is hot and now is the time to get it.

“They will get deluged by applications,” said Greta Carter, president of G.Car Companies, a marijuana business consulting firm in Seattle. And the submissions will be from groups that are even better capitalized than those who pursued licenses in Maryland, which saw major players like Columbia Care, PharmaCann, and Harvest Inc. apply.

“There’s larger money wanting to get into Hawaii,” Carter said. “The competition is significant there. I know a lot of people that have thrown their hats in the ring, and some that have backed off because the competition is so rough.”

What are Carter’s plans in the Aloha state? While she’s been behind 11 successful applications across the growing, processing, and retail sectors, she decided to sit Hawaii out, despite being tempted by a couple of opportunities, she said.

AZ bill could significantly curtail industry

Does a proposed bill in Arizona that could put a big dent in the state’s MMJ medical marijuana patient pool have a chance of passing?

That’s the question that some medical marijuana businesses owners and other advocates are asking after Rep. Jay Lawrence proposed a law that would prohibit naturopathic and homeopathic doctors from recommending medical marijuana to their patients. Arizona’s Department of Health Services recently reported that naturopathic doctors issued more than 87% of the 77,639 medical marijuana certifications for patients in 2015.

The lawmaker’s bill, and a separate proposal to restrict pregnant women from possessing cannabis at all, have recalled the long and bitter fight MMJ advocates waged to force the roll-out of Arizona’s MMJ law.

However, because the state’s medical marijuana law was enacted through referendum, the bill would require a supermajority to pass. If it does get that far, it would also have to survive legal challenges under the state’s Voter Protection Act, which limits the ability of lawmakers to change laws passed by referendum, amend laws enacted via ballot initiatives.

“It’s a fatally flawed bill,” said attorney Ryan Hurley of the Rose Law Group in Scottsdale. “Any change to (a referendum-based) law has to further the purpose of the intent of the law. Homeopathic and naturopathic doctors were included in the language of the ballot, so there is no way taking them out achieves the purpose of the ballot,” Hurley explained.

Omar Sacirbey can be reached at omars@mjbizmedia.com