Costly employment-related lawsuits on the rise in cannabis industry as MJ workforce grows

(This is the first installment of a two-part series about legal issues facing marijuana companies. Read Part II here.)

By Bart Schaneman

Marijuana companies are seeing an uptick in lawsuits tied to employment issues, reflecting the cannabis industry’s growing pains as it transforms into a more mainstream business.

The latest involves a suit targeting Electrum Partners, a well-known cannabis investment advisory firm in Las Vegas.

A former vice president there alleges she was fired for having cancer and because she blew the whistle about sexual practices among company executives “that posed a risk” to the firm.

Attorneys say the increase in such lawsuits has occurred because many cannabis companies have focused on boosting profits and growing their businesses – without creating human resources departments to handle personnel issues.

That has triggered a rise in the cannabis industry’s workforce which, in turn, has led to an increasing number of lawsuits over everything from wrongful termination and discrimination to sexual harassment.

The suits can potentially cost a company tens of thousands of dollars and create negative publicity. Attorneys said MJ companies need to implement professional HR practices to prevent such litigation.

“There certainly has been an increase over the years and I expect that it will continue,” said Henry Wykowski, a prominent MJ attorney in San Francisco.

“You should be very careful when making a determination when to terminate somebody,” he added. “Make sure it doesn’t come back to haunt you.”

Recent lawsuits

The Electrum lawsuit, filed last week by Pamela Johnston in a U.S. court in New York, singles out the company’s founder, Leslie Bocskor.

“Electrum and Mr. Bocskor fired Ms. Johnston because she was suffering from cancer,” the lawsuit alleges. “They also fired Ms. Johnston because she had reported intra-company sexual activity that posed a risk to the company – activity undertaken by Electrum executives that Electrum did not want to address.”

Bocskor, for his part, declined repeated requests from Marijuana Business Daily to comment for this story.

Another recent case: The parent company of Marijuana Business Daily is involved in an ongoing legal dispute with its former president and publisher over employment-related issues, including those tied to his termination, compensation and noncompete agreement.

Lawsuit upswing

These types of lawsuit aren’t necessarily new in the cannabis sector.

In 2015, for instance, a former attorney at the marijuana software firm BioTrackTHC sued the Florida company over alleged violations of an employment contract.

The change, however, is that this type of legal action is becoming more common.

Daniel Shortt, a Seattle cannabis attorney with the Harris Bricken law firm, is among those who noted a marked increase in employment-related lawsuits.

Companies have approached Shortt’s firm after having been targeted for unlawful termination or violations of employment contracts.

“You shouldn’t treat your marijuana business as if it’s some special entity when it comes to employment and labor,” he said. “You have to operate as a business first. That means complying with employment laws at the state and federal level. ”

Rachel Gillette, a Denver cannabis attorney with Greenspoon Marder, is aware of similar lawsuits.

“All of those cases occur,” she said. “Anything that happens in the normal business world is going to happen in the marijuana business world.”

Her cannabis clients have had issues with employees allegedly mismanaging product inventory. That can lead to problems with tracking and reporting inventory to the state. That, in turn, can create the appearance of product diversion.

“All that needs to be carefully documented,” Gillette said. “Not only to terminate, but also to make sure that the business can show that they addressed the issue, what happened with the compliance violation, etc.”

Contract problems

To avoid HR pitfalls, Gillette counsels her marijuana business clients to:

  • Make sure they have an appropriate employee handbook.
  • Be wary of creating contracts.
  • Keep records if an incident happens.
  • Document any compliance issues.

In terms of contracts, Gillette has seen issues tied to noncompete clauses that people have signed.

Often the noncompetes are unenforceable – or courts are loathe to enforce them – if, for example, they spell out an unreasonably long time that a former employee is barred from taking a job at a competitor, according to Gillette.

She added that employers often incorrectly classify their staff as independent contractors. That can mean a business fails to withhold state and federal taxes for an employee.

“There can be substantial penalties with that,” Gillette said.

Aside from the sexual harassment, wrongful termination and discrimination claims, other major issues Gillette sees as crucial are safety and health violations, specifically when employees are handling and applying pesticides.

“I’d like to see employers – as much planning as they put into their grow facilities – I’d like them to put the same amount of planning into their work environments for their employees,” she said.

HR takes back seat to growth

Industry insiders said companies that land in legal hot water often have failed to implement proper HR practices.

“We see it constantly that clients don’t have these things in place and don’t think about putting them in place until they have a problem,” said Keegan Peterson, founder and CEO of Wurk, a Denver tech company offering a platform that helps cannabis companies manage HR activities.

Not only does this issue arise as a result of a growing industry, but it’s common to see startups struggle with the HR piece as they expand.

Small businesses “tend to pay less attention to it,” said Barton Morris, principal attorney with the Cannabis Legal Group in Royal Oak, Michigan. “But it’s one of the most important parts of the business.”

Shortt said it’s important that a small company at least be aware of these issues as the business grows until it can bring on someone full time.

“A lot of these businesses are small, and they don’t necessarily have an HR person,” he added. “One option is to have someone in management take on that role to make sure those things are in place.”

The situation has implications for the entire MJ industry.

“We don’t want to be the industry that’s not doing these things,” said Peterson. “That doesn’t treat its employees right.”

Bart Schaneman can be reached at barts@mjbizdaily.com

7 comments on “Costly employment-related lawsuits on the rise in cannabis industry as MJ workforce grows
  1. clifton middleton on

    Legalizing the pot industry turns out to be the most corrupt, filth filled bonanza for lawyers, scammer politicians ever and the most influence infected bummed out bad business BS ever perpetrated by government. Just get out of the way and we will restore prosperity. The pot business has been a hundreds of billions of dollars a year industry without the government, we the People govern ourselves …. that is Patriotism.

    Reply
  2. Jeff on

    Work comp and withholding taxes are number 1&2 issues. Gotta protect yourself and follow all regular business rules for all employee related items. Consider EPLI and EBL coverages.

    Reply
  3. massvocals on

    I,m member of union, The Carpenters , NERCC our agreement allows drug testing. its a fraud .. The urine test does not show impairment which the contact agreement states, employee has to been working on job site under the influence .This requires no probable cause. When dispatch a prerequisites test by urine said to be voluntary act on the behalf of the perspective employee This is warranted or no job offer / everyone is suspect till proven not to be one for over 7 years I have object over this treatment , The labor department has drop the drug free work place act , there is no exception for medical uses the union refuses to change its policy The signatory get credit by insurance companies , you no longer need to be qualified employee you first have to pass there political correctness test , there Urine testing, This test does not test performance nor any safety issue its nothing more then enforcing un -scientific insensible principles ,upon workers . Those principles of liberty thrown out for a beggars chance for employment , which is said to be ( at will ) just say NO

    Reply
  4. massvocals on

    There no drug test for cannabis which shows any level of impairment any test test for THC-COOH which is not delta 9 THC there testing the wrong metabolite and uses those results as impairment , THC – COOH can never result in any level of impairment just say no to drug testing the only way to test for delta 9 THC and impairment

    Reply
  5. Blank Reg on

    “She added that employers often incorrectly classify their staff as independent contractors. That can mean a business fails to withhold state and federal taxes for an employee.”

    To be able to do that properly requires access to proper BANKING services. That is still the biggest challenge of all when running a cannabis business. Sadly, because of Federal interference in banking, cash is still king. Who is willing to sit and figure out the proper withholdings, and do it all in cash envelopes, for both staff and government kleptocracies, every other week, minimum? Simple banking services is the biggest challenge of all.

    Reply
    • Dakota Lally on

      Extremely valid point Blank Reg. Another one of those situations that doesn’t make sense like the IRS taxing cannabis businesses, despite it’s scheduled status.

      Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *