Week in Review: Marijuana vs. alcohol, CA’s lagging cannabis tax revenue & Utah MMJ ally

State-legal cannabis users consume less liquor and medications, according to a report, California isn’t fetching as much marijuana tax revenue as anticipated, and Utah’s MMJ campaign gains a key supporter.

Here’s a closer look at some notable developments in the cannabis industry over the past week.

Untapped market

A study showing that recreational cannabis consumers use less booze, over-the-counter pain drugs and sleep aids is an opportunity for marijuana business executives.

Cannabis business owners who want to capitalize on the information should realize there’s a vast, untapped market of people who aren’t typical marijuana consumers. That includes an older generation curious about cannabis products.

So says Brett Roper, CEO of Denver-based Medicine Man Technologies.

He advises marijuana business executives to educate consumers that a wide variety of cannabis products are available that can provide similar results.

“You have an opportunity for people who say, ‘I’ve always been curious, but I was afraid to try it because it was illegal, and I didn’t want to get in trouble. I’m a law-abiding person,’” he said.

A smart dispensary or cannabis retail shop owner can help train budtenders to educate consumers who are looking for an alternative to alcohol, sleep aids or pain drugs, Roper said. Just focus on the properties in cannabis that can provide the results these people are seeking.

“They’ll find a product that’s a little less addictive and far easier on your body,” he added.

To Roper, it would seem logical that a law-abiding citizen who is consuming alcohol and prescription sleep medicine would gravitate toward other legal forms of sleep and relaxation supplements.

“There are a lot of folks who have driven between the lines and wouldn’t cross that line,” he said. “What’s happening is you’re finding people who relied on alcohol or pills or some other substance to help dull that pain or make them more comfortable or help them sleep at night.

“Now they have an alternative.”

A taxing situation

News that California’s first-quarter haul of marijuana excise taxes underperformed state government expectations isn’t going to make life easier for the state’s cannabis businesses.

Rather, it’s likely the opposite.

Much of the predicted $175 million that was supposed to materialize by the end of June has already been spoken for in the state budget, said Sacramento-based political consultant Dustin Moore.

Because the state took in only $34 million during the first three months of 2018, there may be a shortfall come July, meaning it will be more difficult to persuade lawmakers to support a tax cut for MJ companies.

Besides, Moore said, there was already political opposition to such a cut. Political heavyweights such as the Service Employees International Union have already said they oppose a cannabis tax reduction.

“That was an uphill battle to begin with,” Moore said. “I don’t want to say that it’s DOA, but certainly after the SEIU (opposition) letter came out, it’s a serious uphill battle.”

Still, he believes California’s tax revenue will increase solidly as the cannabis market progresses, more companies are licensed and the state’s tax collection methods come more fully online.

“Frankly, it’s the difference between carrots and sticks,” said Moore, who helped run California’s Proposition 64 legalization campaign two years ago.

“Right now, there are some carrots in the sense that, if you pay your taxes, at least you’re on the record as having done so.

“But there are no sticks, because there’s no way to enforce upon folks that don’t pay their taxes, because there’s no track and trace.”

Moore said he “would hope that (excise tax revenue) would double” in the second quarter, but he added that a significant increase in tax revenue likely won’t materialize until the third or fourth quarters this year.

Photo finish

A contentious medical marijuana initiative in Utah is coming down to the wire, with both sides trying to muster last-minute support.

Salt Lake County District Attorney Sam Gill was the latest to join the fray, offering a show of support by saying the use of medical cannabis should be a decision between a patient and doctor.

As of Thursday, the initiative still was showing valid signatures of 155,330, 40,000 more than needed to be placed on the November ballot; another 47,352 signatures have been ruled invalid for a variety of reasons, according to the Utah elections site.

But it’s unclear if those totals include results from an effort by Drug Safe Utah to persuade people to withdraw their signatures. Drug Safe Utah includes the Utah Medical Association, Utah Narcotics Officers Association and other groups.

Utah’s director of elections, Justin Lee, was out Thursday, and his office didn’t return a request for comment.

Lee told Marijuana Business Daily last week that counties must verify signatures by May 15, and then the state has until June 1 to certify the petitions. “Nothing is official until that time,” he wrote in an email.

Utah Gov. Gary Herbert has been outspoken against medical marijuana, but during a recent news conference, the Republican criticized the effort to undermine the petition, saying, “Let’s have the vote. Let’s have the debate.”

Utah Patients Coalition, which led the medical marijuana initiative, didn’t immediately respond for comment Thursday. It issued a news release last month saying it had enough valid signatures to appear on the November ballot.

The Mormon church has been cautious on the issue, though it said in a short statement in April that “we respect the wise counsel” of the medical community.

Bart Schaneman can be reached at [email protected]

John Schroyer can be reached at [email protected]

Jeff Smith can be reached at [email protected]

3 comments on “Week in Review: Marijuana vs. alcohol, CA’s lagging cannabis tax revenue & Utah MMJ ally
  1. Hal on

    If California’s greedy politicians would have made what could have been a smooth application process they only had a year and a half, instead they have complicated it. Not enough employees to process licensing. Now let’s consider this, how could California expect to meet tax revenue expectations when they have not issued but a few licenses????

    Reply
  2. George Bianchini on

    Can we just make cannabis illegal again. Life was much easier with Prop 215 and ab 420. Sure we had to get a card and there were some bad apples, but we are going to have as a result of this new regulatory scheme that’s not in compliance with the spirit of the voters of California, far more bad apples now that it’s legal.
    We used to fear the DEA. Now we have the other three letter devils (TLD), the IRS the BCC the FDA and NSF. Thank goodness the FBI and CIA are busy with our criminal in chief. Most venders don’t even know that when the FDA comes around, every adulterated product other than pure flower has to go through them. We just finished our yearly FDA review for our partnered Pharmaceutical Company. It lasted a full week. I would rather be water boarded. Every product that our industry sells now (once the FDA lets the dust settle) will cost an additional 50 to 100 grand each to bring to market. That’s on top of having a full NSF and FDA certified manufacturing facility. This most likely won’t happen till the Fed’s de-schedule cannabis. But it’s coming!
    The BCC needs to let our industry operate, or most will do so without them. Even so, most of the smaller players that paid the heavy price to build our industry will be tossed out like a limp salad. Our FES (another three letter devil) AKA the Free Enterprise System, may be the most brutal player of them all. The big boys will chew us up and spit us out, most likely earning someone a bonus for destroying the market place for profit.
    We’re early in the new Cannabis game. We’ve just teed up and hit the ball long, hard and straight, right on top of a sprinkler head bouncing our ball right into the rough. It’s time for a mulligan, a breakfast ball or just a simple do over. I think it’s time to rethink this ridiculous regulatory scheme and start over. A brand new regulatory scheme designed for success not failure. One that allows the legal market a competitive edge over the illicit black market, that allows law abiding citizens safe access to the flowers of their choice.
    And one more thing, is it too much to ask for a board member that actually knows what a cannabis plant looks like. Just a thought.

    Reply
  3. Jim on

    Maybe the reason less alcohol is being consumed is because people are being charged an outrageously high price for all marijuana products. It’s interesting hearing all of the whining about greed for nearly anything imaginable, but never a mention of the astronomical prices being charged by marijuana growers and dispensary owners.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *