Local corruption becoming hurdle for marijuana license seekers in California

Allegations of corruption during competitive bidding for marijuana business licenses is far from a new phenomenon, especially in California, where tales of backdoor wheeling-and-dealing between companies and public officials have been circulating for years.

But the state’s newly regulated market, launched in January, has brought the issue even more to the forefront, as illustrated by at least four different cases that have garnered media attention in recent months. The FBI even got involved in one instance.

Stories of corruption will continue to emerge, sources say, largely because local licenses are a prerequisite to obtaining a state permit.

That puts local officials in a position of power over entrepreneurs who may be desperate to find a path into the industry.

“In the legal market, they’re going to continue to have corruption issues, because local folks are easier to bribe and corrupt than state bureaucrats,” said Matt Kumin, a longtime cannabis industry attorney based in San Francisco.

“You see allegations like this all over the place, because the state decided it was more important to give locals control than to have a uniform and less-corruptible process statewide.”

Illustrating the problem

A few examples that highlight California’s cannabis corruption issues:

  • In February 2017, in Huntington Park, eight medical marijuana dispensary applicants sued the Los Angeles suburb in federal court. The suit alleges several officials – including the mayor, vice mayor and a City Council member – conspired with private companies to award the city’s three dispensary permits to predetermined companies, essentially defrauding subsequent bidders of their $5,000 application fees.
  • In January, one licensed retailer filed suit against the city and county of San Francisco, alleging the local board of supervisors passed over the company for a license but later granted one to a competitor that had contributed thousands of dollars to several board members’ political campaigns.
  • In May, FBI officials raided the mayor of Adelanto‘s home and executed search warrants there, at city hall and at an MJ retailer in the city northeast of L.A. The nature of the investigation has not been disclosed, but the incident follows the 2017 arrest of Adelanto’s vice mayor, who stands accused of taking bribes to “fast-track a marijuana business,” according to the Los Angeles Times.
  • Also in May, a Humboldt County Planning and Building Department inspector was arrested on bribery charges, and is alleged to have defrauded various companies, including some in the cannabis sector.

None of these cases has fully run its course, and both lawsuits are still active.

But what they illustrate is an immediate hurdle for California businesses still attempting to get licenses.

Ed Muramoto, one of the lead attorneys for the Huntington Park plaintiffs, told Marijuana Business Daily his firm is investigating “a handful” of other jurisdictions and may file parallel corruption lawsuits by the end of the year.

“We hear about this all the time,” he said. “Adelanto is the most recent example, but there’s going to be many, many examples like this.”

He’s not the only cannabis industry stakeholder to express such concerns.

“In every jurisdiction there is a different shakedown,” said Sacramento-based consultant Jackie McGowan.

“Whether it’s from a planner, a council member, a consultant or a landlord, there is a consistent expectation that cannabis companies must pay to play.

“I ask myself often, ‘Am I just naive? Is this the way the world works in other industries?’ I don’t know the answer to this yet.”

‘Money runs the show’

The situation also brings to the forefront how the lines between legal lobbying by business interests and outright corruption can be blurred.

“There’s going to be a lot that gets uncovered, but then there’s also these fine lines of, what is and isn’t corruption?” said Amanda Ostrowitz, CEO of CannaRegs, which tracks local regulatory developments across California.

“When people call corruption because they correlate the timing of a donation (from a business) to a certain city or certain council member and then that business gets what they want, that’s an area where people really need to tread lightly, because that’s how this world operates. Money runs the show.”

The key is whether companies are dealing legally and transparently with public officials.

“Are you doing it within the confines of lobbying and general campaign contributions, or are you directing it as a bribe?” Ostrowitz said. “The differences between those two isn’t as obvious as one may think.”

Ostrowitz emphasized that the “vast majority” of local officials are “trying to do right” by the cannabis industry, and it’s not as though every municipality and county is trying to elicit bribes from marijuana executives.

Kumin agreed, saying there’s a “spectrum” of corruption that occurs in nearly every American industry, not just the cannabis space.

Recourse for entrepreneurs

It’s often difficult for unsuccessful license applicants to know if they’ve fallen victim to law-breaking city officials, have a case that’s worth filing suit over, or should just cut their losses and attempt to get a business permit in another municipality.

Muramoto, the attorney, suggests companies that suspect the law has been broken regarding the licensing process use the “reasonable man standard.”

“I know it when I see it. If it looks bad, if it smells bad, if it sounds bad, it’s probably bad,” he added.

Filing suit over alleged corruption is a possible recourse, albeit a time-consuming one.

Just ask Muramoto.

He received a ruling from a federal judge in mid-June that found a portion of Huntington Park’s MMJ ordinance to be unconstitutional. Muramoto believes the city will have to reissue its three dispensary permits since the licensees have not yet received state licenses and, thus, are not operational.

But the judge has yet to issue a formal order in the 17-month-old case, and there’s no guarantee any of the plaintiffs will ultimately win a business permit in Huntington Park.

To Kumin, the issue belies a larger problem: the tendency for local California governments to limit the number of cannabis business licenses in their jurisdictions.

“The more caps you see … the more rife the possibilities for corruption,” he surmised.

John Schroyer can be reached at [email protected]

12 comments on “Local corruption becoming hurdle for marijuana license seekers in California
  1. John Phillips on

    This is what I’ve been talking about for months now! I have spoken to the BCC, CDFA, FBI, DHS, you name it, I’ve talked to them. Right Now, I’m at the Bureau of Real Estate, in Sacramento.
    Unfortunately, I’m one of the many victims of corruption in Mendocino Ca. I had high hopes, as we all did, that following the legal road would lead to a better place. I think we all just wanna grow, sell and smoke in peace. Although, overcoming the entrenched corruption, which has been running rampant for decades, is proving to be a nightmare, but it’s not impossible! Lots a big wealthy fish to take down.
    Luckily, I have proof!!!
    Click the link below, and watch security footage of the Mendocino Sheriff’s allowing the theft of almost my entire crop.
    If you’re wondering why they would do that, as I did provide my legal documentation, the officers told me, they don’t like pot growers in their town, said, they were not going to help me, and that I should leave.

    https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCNVDaG07WqgB94RLfonUElQ

    Reply
    • Stuart H on

      So who was behind this “theft”and did they have a warrant? Was it the FBI under some misplaced Session’s policy that has since been abandoned (supposedly)?

      Do you have a law firm aggressive enough to confront this? If not, they will just be part of the problem unfortunately. The legal side of the street is just as corrupt as the illegal…you just pay taxes.

      Reply
      • Pat on

        I would venture to argue that at this juncture, the “legal” side is much more corrupt than the “illegal”. The legal is making money off of taxes for implementing an incredibly corrupt “law.”

        Reply
    • Hastings RH on

      Corrupt oligarchs and politicians? Who would have thunk?

      anybody with a brain knows regulated oligopolies are a cesspool of corruption. Just look at Russia

      Reply
    • Hastings RH on

      What is wrong with a free market system where it’s easy to get legal, pay taxes, not sell to kids? Consumers would migrate to best quality service and price and the state would haul in billions a year in increased revenue.

      The black market loves this crooked system

      Reply
  2. Vince Ciroli on

    Local politicians see congressman and senators living in multi million dollar homes and having net worth in the multi-millions on meager salaries and say why not me.

    Think of it as the Swamp Goes Local!

    Reply
    • Pat on

      The swamp in this case is centered at the state level. It took the state to come up w/this law to facilitate and intensify local corruption they already knew existed. It’s likely that they passed the law in the form it was in because of this. Local govs should not have been given this kind of discretion because of that already inherent and known historical corruption in many jurisdictions across the state. The state’s entirely to blame for allowing themselves to be influenced by a overtly criminal element. The state could have standardized the process. They chose not to.

      Reply
  3. Rick on

    It isn’t just California that’s experiencing corruption, it’s happening in lots of different states and it’s main cause is Congress failing to make cannabis legal at the federal level. The federal government is much more capable of regulating and overseeing the industry than this patchwork approach of having different states trying different ways to keep Jeff Sessions away.

    What do we have to do to get Congress to do their job, march on Washington carrying torches and pitchforks? Confront them whenever we see them in public? Two thirds of the country is in favor of legalizing cannabis, it should already be legal by now. The way things are going, the whole industry could be corrupt in one way or another by the time Congress gets off their butts.

    Reply
  4. David Abbasi on

    This is happening in Bakersfield and Kern County. Local officials are working with special interest groups to create unfair economic advantages. They’re taking money to create favorable legislation or provide protection from code enforcement. There’s a lot of proof now with their own confessions and paper trails and an active investigation.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *