Here’s why nobody is happy with the current state of the Los Angeles marijuana industry

Here's why nobody is happy with the current state of the Los Angeles marijuana industry, Here’s why nobody is happy with the current state of the Los Angeles marijuana industry

Los Angeles marijuana czar Cat Packer did an impromptu Oprah Winfrey impersonation during an appearance at a Mendocino County retreat earlier this month when asked what she’d do with an unlimited budget and staff.

“Everyone would get licenses!” the director of the Los Angeles Department of Cannabis Regulation said with a smile, spurring the audience to giggle, cheer and clap.

“You get a license! You get a license! You get a license! Everyone would get licenses, and no one would get arrested.”

But the reality is, this is anything but a laughing matter for Los Angeles cannabis businesses.

To the California Minority Alliance (CMA), for instance, it’s an issue that rises to legal action.

The trade group announced plans to sue City Attorney Mike Feuer’s office, contending that South Central L.A. has been “ignored” when it comes to cracking down on unlicensed MJ shops.

The lawsuit’s filing isn’t far off, CMA President Donnie Anderson told Marijuana Business Daily last week, noting his organization has met with several “powerhouse” lawyers interested in taking the case.

“We’re declaring war,” Anderson said, adding that the CMA has the support of both Gov. Gavin Newsom’s and L.A. Police Chief Michael Moore.

Soon after the CMA telegraphed its legal plans, the Southern California Coalition (SCC) sent a separate, more conciliatory letter to Feuer’s office, suggesting a number of different enforcement tactics it hopes will be more successful in closing rogue marijuana shops that have been undercutting legal retailers.

“We feel like it’s the only avenue left,” SCC Executive Director Adam Spiker said with a tone of resignation.

Feuer’s office declined to comment on its “proprietorial decision making,” a spokesman wrote in an email to MJBizDaily and then referred to an April news release outlining Feuer’s efforts against the illicit MJ market.

Anderson and Spiker said they’ve received no response from Feuer’s office to their letters.

The CMA and SCC’s actions represent an industry at the end of its rope, having been frustrated since the 2017 passage of Proposition M, a local ballot measure that was supposed to set the stage for a new regulatory structure and usher in a new era for L.A. marijuana businesses.

But it hasn’t.

Instead, insiders such as Anderson spent tens of thousands of dollars trying to get into the legal market while watching helplessly as unlicensed shops continued to lure away customers with lower prices. The rogue shops don’t pay taxes or compliance costs.

It’s a story that’s been ongoing since California’s legal market launched in January 2018.

Some L.A. industry insiders said they don’t expect the two letters – or even CMA’s expected lawsuit – to have any effect on the illicit market.

One called the California Minority Alliance lawsuit an “empty threat” and said it’s the district attorney’s job, not the city attorney’s, to charge criminals with felonies, as the Southern California Coalition suggested.

“Everybody is at the same point … where we’re at a boiling point,” said Avis Bulbulyan, CEO of Siva Enterprises, a marijuana consultancy.

Increased enforcement on the horizon?

There may be reason to hope that matters will improve, said Jerred Kiloh, president of the United Cannabis Business Association and operator of The Higher Path, one of L.A.’s 182 licensed retailers.

That’s because Feuer’s office is – for the first time – pursuing a civil case against one of the more “egregious” rogue shops, Kush Club 20, which Feuer’s office targeted in a lawsuit filed in April.

So far, that’s the only known case of the city attorney attempting to use a $20,000-a-day fine against an unlicensed MJ retailer.

But it may not be the last, Kiloh said, because the city has to see what kind of ruling it can get.

“Let’s say this court case, which is a slam dunk, you get a judge who (fines Kush Club 20) $10,000, and the city attorney goes, ‘We just spent $70,000 and a jury trial and the LAPD and the SWAT team and lab testing for product, and we got $10,000 in return?’

“So, they’re waiting to see the (return on investment),” Kiloh said.

“We’re all waiting for that.”

Kiloh hopes authorities make an example of Kush Club 20, which could lead to more actions.

Bulbulyan, meanwhile, said he’s heard a big sweep of raids against illegal operators is in the works, with federal, state and local law enforcement agencies combining their efforts for a major crackdown on the illicit market.

“With all the frustration that’s been building up, all the ‘Whac-a-Mole’ enforcement, I think it’s gotten to a point not too different from what we saw in Anza (Valley),” Bulbulyan said, referring to a multiagency raid earlier this month on unlicensed MJ farms in that Southern California region.

Incremental progress

Though Anderson, Kiloh and others agree there has been progress in L.A., stakeholders would prefer more.

Packer’s DCR has issued 111 temporary approvals for Phase 2 nonretail business license applicants, as well as 186 retailers that received permits under Phase 1.

But Phase 3 – when more social equity permits will be granted and licensing will also open for the general public – won’t begin until at least September, a DCR spokeswoman wrote in an email to MJBizDaily. And there’s talk the timeline could be pushed further.

Once Phase 3 launches, Packer expects to hit an “undue concentration” limit for licenses that will automatically put a cap on permits.

Packer believes that will happen in the coming fiscal year, which means there likely won’t be room in L.A. for everyone who wants a marijuana business license.

John Schroyer can be reached at [email protected]

8 comments on “Here’s why nobody is happy with the current state of the Los Angeles marijuana industry
  1. Rod Gass on

    “which means there likely won’t be room in L.A. for everyone who wants a marijuana business license.”

    Look BCC, it’s simple, you’re attempting the impossible.

    Folks in LA and the rest of California don’t want government interference in marijuana commerce. Try to understand the BCC does nothing for marijuana nor it’s consumers.

    Extortion by threat of punishment, has been the BCC product.

  2. George on

    “Let’s say this court case, which is a slam dunk, you get a judge who (fines Kush Club 20) $10,000, and the city attorney goes, ‘We just spent $70,000 and a jury trial and the LAPD and the SWAT team and lab testing for product, and we got $10,000 in return?’’

    The above statement is what it’s like when you are licensed. The BCC’s regulations almost guaranty failure. Even the big boy’s are losing millions. We see it right here in this Mag. I am licensed and really regret it. Prop 64 could have been a good start at legalizing cannabis. The BCC rules and regs are to prop 64, like [t]he Donald is to our constitution.

  3. Howard Paris on

    California and L.A. will be a complete debacle until the existing laws and regulations are repealed and new regulation phased in VERY SLOWLY. Gov’t created this black market and it certainly won’t go away because Sacramento tries to overturn legalization. From the industry perspective, the BCC is just more of the same BS. Actually, keeping the black market is a good thing. It keeps corporate ag and pharma guessing, which isn’t good for them. Shame on State and Local Gov’ts for being completely, utterly incompetent.

  4. Mike Johnson on

    Heavy-handed enforcement and excessive fines to ensure the continuation of egregious fees and taxes. This is regulation, not legalization. This is what corporate/government takeover looks like. This is not what many people voted for and if this form of “legalization” was voted on again today it would probably lose. Perhaps we need a new proposition that strips away this “legalization” and destroys most of the investment portfolios of the parasites who have come to roost. Then we can start over.

  5. Lora N. on

    Hey Cat, License the Competent, compatible outlaws. Give them the same deals N’ opportunities as the 182 to be protected until licensed. Think of Angelenos before The outside perpetrators invading our communities. Y’all get mad about Latinos coming here to work and sending their earnings to another country, but give tax breaks to those taking over the LA Capitalism and moving their cash to The Netherlands. Does anyone not realize that California’s Government is Agent Oranging it’s own front line? So much research and data this administration has to learn about the Cannabis culture and it’s best learned by studying the masses, then the select few. I’d be pissed too if I bought into the lie… but that’s why temporary legal companies have a legit reason to want to sue… you’ve been cheated out of some hefty fees and betrothed the “promised Land in which to dwell” only to find out it’s full of The Indigenous people’s who’ve been “squatting” on that land. There’s a way to set this right for all. Create regulations that benefit the all, give state/city/county tax breaks or special benefits to the 182 (reparations for Prop D/Measure M BS that created the corrupt system), create educational structure to train (skill) the capable and willing to abide by fair practices and proper regulation. Let Legal entities, sponsor or take up stake in a mentorship/apprentice type of program. This is me just brainstorming on the ideas that could unite LA not keep it divided… it’s about a bigger picture California. Wake up and wield your weapon with integrity and Authority built on Truth…or fall to the federal pressure and blame of incompetency.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *